Відео

Singularity

This will set your mind on fire: ua-cam.com/video/v0B6zclHwUY/v-deo.htmlsi=mLZ6mzMN3nRd8A6m

I feel the world has become agonisingly real since the internet. For me at least. Part of me wants to commit myself to something Intangible like a religion because I basically wanna escape into fantasy where my heart can’t be crushed my inevitable worldly shortcomings- but I need to toughen my ass up.

I saw entities on DMT Sorry trip community but a geometric cartoon cat telling what my ass knew at heart was not otherworldly Geometry is my visual cortex desperately trying to build familiar forms From a fried graphics card and edge recognition and other vital hardware/software. Also the colours again are just my internal palette going bananas again trying to do world building with “a Nintendo cartridge shoved in my Sega mega drive port” I used to knock the cartridge playing wonderboy 3 deliberately and it would corrupt the game play and I could do mad stuff like walk through walls. I feel DMT does similar.

Thank you very much, really interesting. I have been asking for years if people see the connection in form, between a person's face and a person's body. Or I have such a claim that all life looks like a butterfly, and a butterfly looks like all life. And everything looks like the shape of a magnetic field.

Me and two pals stood in my Car park round his car talking one night when over the house tops came the sharp end of black triangle that slowly moved towards and above us. It hid the stars behind and blacked out the sky totally. It was silent and some detail could be made out with some ease. It looked mechanistic and not unlike painted metal or like. It was about the size of a small football pitch. We all just looked at each other in awe then carried on chatting lol.

Upon Trying DMT I saw hyper shapes like tesseract etc way before I encountered any In my waking life. What’s that about? If that’s a brain fart it’s a hell of a sharp one.

Is particle just the failover of the map to describe a far more subtle landscape beneath. Like maths isn’t fluid enough to map a sea?

Im curious if you posit some fundamental laws such as Leibniz's "Compossibility" where the degree of freedom for level 1/7 Is limited by what already exists (so it has to be compatible and possible)?

This Theoria Apophasis ( Ken Wheeler’s channel ) but wirh actual proofs or if not direct proof via experiment- it is not arrogant word salad. - Sorry Ken, you can be a complete hubristic ass.

You are such a strange creator, for me. So much that you create is deeply beautiful and I can't help but feel my heart leap when you talk about art and perspective and magic. You also go to some places I just can't follow such as morphic resonance. I am, in sum, happy you are doing what you do. Thank you.

A true tour de force. Have you read Grosseteste “On Light”? I’m seeing many resemblances between your essay and his writing

This whole video reminds me of the quote “Science is wonderfully equipped to answer the question “how?” but it gets terribly confused when you ask the question “why?” “

PLS BRO, I NEED PART 2, NOW!!!

So amazingly articulate

Love it!

Existential Stockholm Syndrome is one of the only mental defenses against suicide.

1:55:46 wait, the aether is "produced" by the atoms and moves with them? I thought the aether is an absolute background

My only evidence of coherent energy is experience. Through my experience I observed centrifugal vortexes I observed waves and fields. I also have an oddly imagined interpretation of gravity. It has been about two years now I have offered electron communication. Quantum tunneling through energy conversion into matter. However, the experience happened in 1983. Understanding all of this information is literally easy as listening to music. I have come to accept the spectrum of energy provides us categorical information. Little by little I release my secrets over youtube these last 2 years.

I'm starting up a new podcast on aether based ontologies. First episode is dropping next week. Would love to have you on to discuss your ideas. Do you consider your model a ToE?

Very cool. This is what I'm aiming to do with my channel too too. Your style is great

Dude, jargon is something one under-rates at one's peril.. that shit is power man. Idk, once scientists were no longer cocain crazed madmen everything started to suck.

Matters is the reaction of the void

Maybe here. ∫ dt { ∑ 𝑴\_i̇(t) + ½ ∑ Ω\_i(t)Tʀ[ 𝑴\_i(t) ] Ω\_i(t) - µ\_0 ε\_0 ∇ × [ ∇ × E\_i(t) ] + ∑ ĸ\_i(t) ∇ V\_TRD(q\_i(t), {q\_j(t)}) + ⅙ c⁻² ∂[ ∇ × E\_i(t) ] × E\_i(t) + ∑ 𝑭\_{ext,i}(t, {q\_j(t)}, {ω\_j(t)}) + ∑ 𝑴\_{ext,i}(t, {q\_j(t)}, {ω\_j(t)}) } dτ = ∑ q\_i(t) ∫ dt { 𝑴_i̇(t) + ½ Ω_i(t)Tʀ[ 𝑴_i(t) ] Ω_i(t) - µ_0 ε_0 ∇ × [ ∇ × E_i(t) ] + ĸ_i(t) ∇ V_TRD(q_i(t), {q_j(t)}) + ⅙ c⁻² ∂[ ∇ × E_i(t) ] × E_i(t) + 𝑭_ext,i(t, {q_j(t)}, {ω_j(t)}) + 𝑴_ext,i(t, {q_j(t)}, {ω_j(t)}) } dτ = q_i(t)

You sound like reincarnated Terence McKenna.

When 2 clocks don't stay in sync, time doesn't change. They clocks change due to electromagnetic fields. There is no such thing as time or space-time. It's so simple.

Sounds plausible but there is no addressing the quark particles here. I don’t see that quarks as a phenomenon are explained in this theory.

1:04:37 SPOT ON! DING DING DING DING... "TELL HIM WHAT HE'S WON... 🎶" "THE ETHER WAS DISPROVED BY THE M&M EXPERIMENT-" "So... No either? My bad, how bout zero point energy... Or, or, or maybe subtle energy in the vacuum of space... There's a few more but I think you've been sufficiently been proven to be a fraud, if you consider yourself to be a scientist. If u call things that are correct "woowoo" cuz ur incapable of understanding it when actual smart people explain. These people, tho not officially scientists, are more scientists than they could possible fathom. One of my gauges for sussing out good people as opposed to evil people is, when one person truly wants to learn the correct answer, the other wants to be right, even if he is not. That's a big one for me cuz it says a lot! Especially professionally in academia. EDIT: all the crap talking was directed toward the person saying either does not exist.

ScIeNcE iSnT dOgMa YoUrE jUsT sTuWuPiD🤓🤓🤓🤡🤡🤡 Science is not dogma, and you are stupid if you believe that this video discusses how science itself is dogma (or at the very least you haven’t watched the whole video). This Formscapes video discusses how Scientism is dogma, and how mainstream science cannot accept new ideas so easily, even in the face of overwhelming proof to support the new ideas. These points have been proven time and time throughout history from the evolution theory, the Big Bang theory, and most recently, the idea that the universe is not locally real has been ridiculed in the past and has been called pseudoscientific. The fact is that these theories have now plenty of proof behind them to the point where they have been widely accepted. The Big Bang Theory and the evolution theory are obviously accepted because they are basic knowledge but even the team that proved nonlocal realism theory won a Nobel prize back in 2022.

Crazy how caring about metaphysics results in a theory that seems more cohesive

I've finally caught up! I've watched all of your videos. You're onto something here. The "secrets" of the universe were never really secrets. We just have to look at how things are and connect the dots. Bringing together all of these different theories and philosophies is exactly what humanity needs to better understand what is. We've become so specialized that "interdisciplinary" can mean working with someone in the next cubicle. Love of Wisdom is not just studying one thing, but studying the full breadth and depth of what there is to know. I've also been on a journey of seeking. There is nothing else that captures my attention and passion than contemplating the mechanics, functions, systems, and phenomena that brings about things that are experienceable. Known and unknown are interesting things. The limited known comes into contact with the virtually infinite unknown when we get onto these topics. I truly appreciate your channel. I feel lucky to have found it and thankful for your work. Stay on the path brother. There are many dangers on the road to the heights one can achieve.

Fantastic content. I think you are definitely on the right path. Jung was a revolutionary. thankyou.

Hello Mate, if you don't mind-Can you provide me fresh discord link of yours? I try to join through Bio link, It is expired.

The ancient creative art of Rhetoric is also another layer of complex understanding

This is the first video on yt that comes the closest to saying what the proven but occulted scientific academics have revealed in the shadows. This is that light, info and energy are all one and the same. Strangely this has gone unheralded in mainstream spotlight of influence regarding the majority of society and I believe I know why. Simply, this is because the idea of everything playing by the same laws of dynamics, directly outlines and supports a reality where some information, light or energy can never be free but requires the individual unit and sensory to meet a certain level of inference and understanding for such to be freely offered among those without merit (work). This perhaps is because this would circumvent the laws on a more macro scale and disrupt the flow of the flocculation as a systemic whole. I can only cite a strange experiment by the king of all experimentors, Standford and the mouse utopia research, as support. This is not an absolute direct reflection as to why, but I can humbly speculate that all the systemic parts together as whole, including the experimentor, become and make up a system within a system. It can also be stated that in every system at some point the individual parts must uphold said laws. I've made it my own personal journey to note those evidences and informatics that remain locked out of the freely discussed spheres and acting as bridges for such emergences (figuratively, a sort of mnemonic synapse in the network). I also have many more evidences supporting such a theory but cannot share these openly across the broad level of the social system without upsetting a certain balance ♎. Is there a way I can reach out directly as, myself, one moving particle in Maxwell's demon illustration to another? I doubt it, based on personal observances, as this might be one of those barriers in such regards, however, it was worth a try. Perhaps a key could be offered. Etymology of two terms share the same π root "Trep" ... entropy and trope!

This has become my favorite youtube channel. You are on the right track.

Man...I always miss your uploads by almost a week. YT notifications are shit.

Last 7 minutes were some of the most profound and insightful stuff I have ever heard

We really need to stop gatekeeping science with complicated words and start using simple everyday English.

Bergson was right if you look arciology of earth study Earth will be nothing else than agglomeration of memories stratification that we take as pass

Thank you for all these clarification it is very disappointing that sciences have no more the independency that they used to have ,but I believe it is haw things go ,historical repeations in any domain is not a fatalistic necessity but as long as mankind remains the same internally the cyclic thinking will also turns in circles

i appreciate these videos so very much. i'm in a deep chronic depression and knowing i can end my day with a smoke and a Formscapes video is getting me thru. thank you.

I am a system of a’ priori modes, not a body of limbs and organs. We need to move beyond the notion of “We” because we as humans is a loose premise at best. In essence, the body conduit has no fixed predicate in the abstract lens. What is it of us that knows that? We should begin to define ourselves as a set of a’ priori modes. A set that allows for systemic alignment. A set synthesised with realities structures and stresses. This is the next step. Everything else is tied up in a field of inverted axioms and that path is a dead end.

Who else is here because they are waking up?)

daseince

After watching, I have two major question: 1) How does matter/other class_physical phenomena influence the morhogenic fields? In the discussion on the double-slit and Michelson-Morley experiments, it seems to be implied, that the enclosure in the physical box causes the interference and even potential interference patterns of light waves to emerge, although in the other part of the video, it is said that photons follow the supergeometrical pre-existing patterns of morphogenic field. Does this mean that physically isolated space does also isolate and re-establish the morphogenic field of the "inside"? In some weird associative sense it reminds me of the hypothesis of how complex physical forms (e.g. brain) capture the background field (e.g. of "mind/consciousness") and make it interfere with itself within the enclosure, giving rise the emergent interference-related features. It was read somewhere here, suit yourself: qri.org/ 2) How does all of this relate to and explain the information as a physical(?) entity?

I think that lunar courterpart to Hero`s journey is very popular in anime in form of stories about adoption. For example, "Dragon maid of miss Kobayashi", or "Senko San". Average office worker adopts otherwordly creature, and through connection to it is completely transformed and healed.

That was a smashing intro👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻brilliant